Samstag, 14. Oktober 2017

Sigma Quattro’s 2-pixel noise artifact finally gets some attention at dpreview.

Quattro’s 2-pixel noise artifact finally gets some attention at dpreview.



I addressed this issue more than 3 years ago already in that forum.
I called it „ants“, „flecks“, „spots“ or „2-pixel noise“

Here from 2014:



In march 2016 the problem was not solved:

August 2016 (noise reduction can't remove it)

It seems that only forum member tagscuderia recognized this error also and mentioned it repeatedly.

Just like now again:

„As a dp0 owner let me say that the 2-pixel crawl artefact was evident from day one and has been touched upon on here... but seemingly only Maceo and myself could see it?! We did however both independently report it to SIGMA with examples“

Probably he won't be heard again.



Montag, 11. September 2017

How to avoid/minimize color casts using vintage lenses on the SD1 Merrill

How to avoid/minimize color casts using vintage lenses on the SD1 (Merrill)
(thanks to user 'motionride' from bilderforum.de)

The Sigma SD1 is known to have problems with vintage lenses. Depending on the lens and aperture setting, you get strong color shifts/vignetting.

Previous generations SD9/SD10/SD14/SD15 do not show this behaviour, or only very little.
Until now, the procedure has been as follows:

Set your camera to A (Aperture Priority) and choose the "Reference Aperture":
F5,6 for the SD9
F2.8 for the SD10
F1.0 for the SD14, SD15 and SD1*
And now you’re good to go..... *but not with the SD1

With the SD1 it has been found that color shifts can be minimized by setting the camera aperture to the same aperture as the lens. 

How does it work?

1. Use the standard method: 
-Set your SD1 camera to A mode and set it to F1.0
-Set your preferred aperture on the lens (for example F5.6) and the camera will display the correct exposure. (for example 1/250)
The exposure will be correct now but unfortunately this causes color shifts.

2. Remember the suggested exposure time (1/250) and switch your camera to M (Manual Mode) 
Now set the time to 1/250 and set the aperture to the same aperture as on the lens (F5.6 in this case)

3. Shoot and be amazed how the color shift has gone.

The following screenshots from SPP show the difference between the two methods.

Even though the same exposure time and aperture was used for the images, the color shift is virtually eliminated:

SD1 with Cosinon 55mm F1.4 (M42-mount)
click for full res
SD1 with Carl Zeiss 135mm F3.5 (M42-mount)
click for full res


Donnerstag, 10. August 2017


"I like the SDQH"
Of course you do, you're a Reference Photographer for Sigma 😆😇


Donnerstag, 1. Juni 2017

High ISO comparison: Sigma sdQH (DNG) vs. dp1m @ ISO1600

Sigma sd Quattro H review (dpreview)
https://www.dpreview.com/reviews/sigma-sd-quattro-h

The DNG implementation seems to be poor and only usable at very low ISO:

Look at the difference between the sd Quattro H and the good old dp1 Merrill at ISO 1600:


Click for 100% 


Mittwoch, 24. Mai 2017

Quattro SFD mode still "Beta"

Quattros SFD mode still shows weird artifacts, even on static subjects.
https://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/59603119
Click for 100%


Forum comments are uncritically, as usual.






Montag, 15. Mai 2017

...jetzt mal Butter bei die Fische

Eine Sigma sd Quattro H plus 50-100mm Art bei bestem Wetter sollte doch eigentlich eine Garantie fßr ansprechende Bildqualität sein.

Wie kommt dann so eine erbärmliche Bildqualität zustande? Und warum wird dies entweder nicht bemerkt oder schlicht nicht angesprochen?

https://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/59561364



Dienstag, 21. März 2017

Ongoing debate on DPREVIEW after a "Photo comparison between DP2M and new SDQ H with 35mm Art"

Big discussion on dpreview...
https://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/59286776
...about the "shadow quality" and colors based on a DP2m photo that is underexposed by 2 stops.

Exposure: Manual - 1/1000 - F6.3 - ISO: 200
...doesn't make any sense.